The largest inventory of mechanical and electrical policy in 2012

Policies contain business opportunities. Being an industry leader, an essential basic skill is to carefully study policies, grasp information in a timely manner, and actively engage in projects. An entrepreneur who does not study policies is by no means a qualified entrepreneur. Companies that are not good at grasping the temperature of policies cannot be a good company. In this article, we will make the following inventory of some of the largest electromechanical policies in 2012.

The most pervasive policy transformation and upgrading will simply double the policy of this year, and a series of documents reflecting the spirit of “transition and upgrading” can be listed.

Among them, the most “point question” is no more than the “Industrial Transformation and Upgrade Plan (2011-2015)” officially issued by the State Council on January 18, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “planning”). This is the first time since the reform and opening up to the entire industry as a planning object, and the State Council issued the implementation of the medium and long-term planning. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan" industrial development achievements and the situation facing the "Twelfth Five-Year Plan", the "Planning" put forward the overall ideas, main objectives, key tasks, development orientation and safeguard measures for industrial transformation and upgrading.

In addition, on May 30, the executive meeting of the State Council discussed and passed the “Twelfth Five-Year National Strategic Emerging Industries Development Plan” and proposed the key development directions and main directions of the seven strategic emerging industries including the high-end equipment manufacturing industry. The mission is to achieve the long-awaited structural adjustment and economic transformation by seizing the next round of economic competition.

The main body of "transformation and upgrading" is in the enterprise, and the soul is innovating. On September 1, the General Office of the State Council also issued the "Guiding Opinions on Promoting Technological Transformation of Enterprises", encouraging enterprises to adopt new technologies, new processes, new equipment, and new materials to upgrade existing facilities, process conditions, and production services. , Eliminating outdated production capacity and implementing connotative development investment activities.

The successive introduction of the above series of plans are all closely related to the main theme of transformation and upgrading. Not only that, the annual work conference held by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology recently also pointed out that the growth target for the value-added of industrial enterprises above designated size in China in 2013 was 10%, which was reduced by one percentage point from the expected target in 2012, leaving more room for industrial transformation and upgrading.

To this end, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has deployed the “6+1” special action for the transformation and upgrading action plan in 2013, including broadband China, upgrading industrial quality brand capabilities, supporting small and micro enterprises, deepening integration of two innovations, industrial strengthening and energy conservation and green development. The six special actions, as well as the improvement of the style of the year activities.

From this we can see that after 2012, “transition and upgrading” will continue through 2013.

The most discreet policy of nuclear power China’s nuclear power construction, which was suspended due to a leakage accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan last spring, was finally restarted at the end of 2012.

In recent years, the climax of nuclear power construction in various parts of China has been rising. In terms of the scale of nuclear power units under construction, China has ranked first in the world. With such a scale, coupled with the continuing enthusiasm, it will inevitably lead to safety. The accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant sounded the alarm in due course and gave the Chinese nuclear power industry a chance to reflect on it.

After a series of nuclear power security checks, on October 24 last year, the State Council executive meeting once again discussed and adopted the "Nuclear Power Safety Plan (2011-2020)" and "Nuclear Power Mid-Long Term Development Plan (2011-2020)" and The principle of the major social concerns such as the construction progress of the nuclear power unit under construction in the three years after the “Twelfth Five-Year Plan” and the restriction on the location of new nuclear power projects were made.

After comprehensive consideration of electricity demand and nuclear safety, the State Council finally made a decision to “steadily return to normal construction”, and explicitly put forward “new” nuclear power generating units that have received a birth certificate and are to be started three years after the “12th Five-year Plan”. The safety standards for the start-up nuclear power units must all comply with the access threshold of the international three-generation nuclear safety standards.

This meeting was seen as a sign of the resumption of nuclear power. It also made domestic nuclear power and related industries that had been anxious for a long time breathed a sigh of relief. However, it is worth noting that inland nuclear power projects have not been thawed simultaneously. The meeting stated that during the “12th Five-Year Plan” period, only a few well-argued nuclear power project sites will be arranged along the coast, and no inland nuclear power projects will be arranged.

Such a decision can be said to be well-intentioned. It would kill the possibility of the “Great Leap Forward” in the cradle of the nuclear power industry, remove the impetuous atmosphere of the nuclear power industry in one fell swoop, and in the second place strengthen the determination to safely and efficiently develop nuclear power from the industry and Both aspects of technology point to the future direction of development.

The haze of Fukushima’s nuclear leakage is far from being exhausted. Compared with technology and capital, the difficulty in realizing the dream of a nuclear power and powerful country at the moment is perhaps more about how to obtain wide public understanding and support for public opinion.

The most fully-expected policy distributed generation Following the "double reverse" in Europe and America last year, India joined the anti-dumping camp of China's photovoltaic products immediately afterwards. The rapid deterioration of the international market environment has caused many photovoltaic companies to suffer. In the same year, China's wind power industry was also a dangerous phenomenon. Severe "rejection of wind" and "consummation of impatience" made it "extremely extreme".

China's wind power and photovoltaic industries, which are deeply pessimistic, have to find new turning points in their development. “Distributed power generation” is carrying many expectations and is known as the “sword of ice-breaking” of these two industries.

The so-called distributed generation usually refers to a small, modular, decentralized, highly efficient and reliable power generation unit that is installed near the user, with a power generation capacity of several kW to several hundreds of megawatts (also recommended to be limited to 30 to 50 MW or less). . The electricity produced is mainly for personal use, with features of small capacity, low voltage level, close to load, small impact on the power grid, etc. It can be applied to industrial plants, public buildings and residents' roofs.

Industry insiders pointed out that its greatest advantage lies in fully utilizing various scattered energy sources, effectively solving the problem of power loss in boosting and long-distance transportation, improving energy efficiency, and also helping to break monopoly, introduce competition, and enter other industries. The electricity market opens the door to convenience.

It is understood that many developed countries have attached great importance to the development of the roof photovoltaic industry, including Germany, Japan, the United States. For example, the United States has established a special subsidy fund for each year through the “10 Million Solar Roof Proposal.” The target is to install 10 million solar energy systems by 2020.

Relevant departments of the Chinese government have also taken actions in this respect, such as the “Golden Sun” project and the photovoltaic building demonstration project that have already been implemented, which will subsidize the distributed photovoltaic power generation system. On October 26 last year, the State Grid Corporation of China also issued the “Opinions on Doing a Good Job of Distributed Photovoltaic Power Grid Connection Services (Interim)” to provide free access to photovoltaic projects that meet the conditions.

The National Energy Work Conference held recently clearly pointed out that in the next few years, distributed photovoltaic power generation in China will usher in a big development.

The most difficult policy to implement New energy vehicle development plan On April 18, 2012, the State Council meeting discussed the adoption of the “Energy-saving and new energy automotive industry development plan”, stipulating the main strategic direction of pure electric drive for the transformation of the automobile industry. The current focus is to promote pure The industrialization of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid vehicles promotes the popularization of non-plug-in hybrid vehicles and energy-saving internal combustion engine vehicles.

On July 9, 2012, the "Energy Conservation and New Energy Vehicle Development Plan (2011-2020)" was officially released after three years of game and waiting. The goal is to achieve a total production and sales volume of pure electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid vehicles in 2015 that will reach 500,000 vehicles and will exceed 5 million by 2020.

The introduction of this plan made it a priority to develop pure electric or hybrid power. The mixed tendency of hybrid propensity for micro-mixing or remixing came to an end. However, doubts about the new energy vehicle's production and sales targets set by the plan were heard.

"In 2015, the cumulative production and sales reached 500,000 vehicles," which is a good thing for companies and even more challenging. On the one hand, according to estimates in the industry, the sales of 500,000 vehicles or nearly 100 billion yuan will allow some participating companies to turn around; on the other hand, the average annual target of about 170,000 vehicles is currently only five digits in sales. In terms of difficulty, it can be imagined.

New energy vehicles are still at the stage of “applauding”. Fan Zijian, deputy director of the Special Management Office for Electric Vehicles of the Ministry of Science and Technology, has disclosed such a set of data. As of October 2011, 25 demonstration cities across the country have promoted a total of 13,085 energy-saving and new energy vehicles, including electric and plug-in hybrids. There are 6,142 new energy vehicles, including fuel cell vehicles, and 6,943 hybrid energy-saving vehicles.

In fact, since the plan was released for more than six months, the number of new energy vehicles in 25 new energy vehicle pilot cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing, and Shenzhen, has indeed not increased significantly.

In response, Su Bo, the vice minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, stated: “It is very difficult to achieve this goal and the task is very arduous. Therefore, we used the word “strive for effort” in the planning. This goal was eventually put forward after discussion and research from all walks of life. Taking into account the difficulty of the target, and fully taking into account the importance of national policies for the support of new energy industries, we hope to achieve this goal through the efforts of various countries, enterprises, and society."

The most eagerly called policy vehicle recall regulations In February 2012, the State Council Legislative Affairs Office issued the Regulations on the Administration of Recall of Defective Automobile Products (Draft for Soliciting Opinions). On October 10th the same year, the State Council executive meeting reviewed and approved the "Defective Automobile Products Recall Management Regulations (Draft)", which will be implemented on January 1, 2013.

Ten years ago, the regulations drafted by the State Quality Supervision Department in 2002 were finally put into practice. This good system that has been matured and implemented in the developed countries has not been very smooth in China.

After the media ban on the Mitsubishi Pajero Motors in 2001 was exposed by the media, the call for car recalls became louder and louder. On October 23, 2002, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine issued the “Management Regulations for the Recall of Defective Automobile Products (Draft)” and solicited opinions from all sectors of the community.

At that time, some media commented on this news: “AQSIQ formally announced to the public the Regulations on the Administration of Recall of Defective Automotive Products (Draft)”, marking the countdown to the implementation of the auto recall system in China.”

One and a half years later, the departmental regulations "Regulations on the Recall of Defective Automotive Products" was formally announced on March 15, 2004. On June 18th of the same year, FAW Group and Guangzhou Honda announced the recall of their Mazda 6 and 03 Accord. This is the first time that the Chinese-made cars have officially announced the recall of their models. This "first time" is like a huge stone falling into the lake, stimulating each one. Strong response from the party.

After this, the AQSIQ had in July 2010 drafted its Regulations on the Supervision of the Recall of Automobile Products (Consultation Draft) to solicit opinions and suggestions from all sectors of the community, but it has not been formally implemented.

After a year and a half of silence, in 2012, the "Draft Automobile Products Recall Management Regulations (Draft)" finally appeared. This means that the Regulation on Recall of Defective Automobile Products, which has a low level of legislation and apparent lack of deterrent force, has become history since 2013, and the system for the recall of defective automotive products has officially been increased from the departmental regulations to administrative regulations.