The reason why robots can be used in large quantities and even dominate the battlefield is mainly because robots have many advantages that are "innate".
Robots can work in special environments that are highly toxic or may explode. The use of robots and automated equipment is the choice of safe, timely and efficient completion of tasks under nuclear, biological and chemical pollution conditions. Robots can perform extremely dangerous tasks. Robotic weapon systems have greater endurance than human systems, and do not degrade performance over long periods of time. Robots are becoming more and more popular because they can accomplish the most dangerous and difficult combat missions that people can't get involved with. The world's military powers competed to develop military robots and incorporated them into the military as part of their combat power. The "Steel Legion" is growing.
With the continuous maturity of technology, especially the development of artificial intelligence technology, the ability of the "Steel Legion" to perform various combat missions will continue to improve. In the middle of the 21st century, the automatic control device will replace most remote control systems and human systems to show their talents on the battlefield. However, what deserves human concern is that the robot will get out of control? Will human survival be threatened by them?
Like all machines, combat robots can fail and malfunction. Although it takes a lot of effort to test and strictly control the quality to reduce the number of problems in the software, it is never possible to completely eradicate the program failure. Therefore, the best solution that people can achieve is to minimize the trouble caused by malfunctioning robots. If the nuclear warheads are "trusted" to robotic cruise missiles, once they fail, the consequences will be disastrous. Moreover, with the development of artificial intelligence, robots will become more and more intelligent, and may become uncontrollable, and even the consequences of its computer "going crazy" or becoming "rebel."
Opponents of robots argue that robotic weapons cannot adapt to the many sudden changes in the battlefield. How can human ideology be embedded in every program of the robot? Is there any morality in a robot that cannot distinguish whether the enemy wants to attack or wants to surrender? Will a malfunctioning robotic weapon become mad and ignited, causing the conflict to escalate endlessly? Can the designers of computer programs really anticipate the various changes that can occur on the battlefield and incorporate countermeasures to deal with such changes into computer programs? Even the best robot designers make mistakes; even the best software systems can't take things into account. The difference between human decision-making and robotic decision-making is that once human decision makers go mad, there may be time to stop them or keep their adverse consequences to a minimum. However, if we give robots the wisdom of superhumans, so that robotic weapons have the ability to quickly choose, learn from each other and communicate, the consequences are very different.
Es Control Cabinet,Customization Es Control Cabinet,Electrical Meter Control Cabinet,Outdoor Es Control Cabinet
Huaian Qiangsheng Cabinet Co., Ltd. , https://www.qscontrolcabinet.com